Flirting with Finance
Flirting with Finance
← All articles
Tools4 min read · 1 July 2026

What SEBI RIAs actually need that ValueResearch Pro doesn't give them

ValueResearch Pro is a well-built product. It has 30 years of fund data, a clean interface, and is trusted by enough advisers that it has become the de-facto reference for SEBI RIAs in India. If you are doing individual fund analysis and want to compare historical return profiles across a category, it is hard to beat.

The gap appears when you think about an RIA's actual daily workflow — which is not primarily about fund research. It is about client portfolios.

What it does well

Where RIAs reach its limits

Multi-client mode doesn't exist. ValueResearch Pro is a fund-research tool, not a client-portfolio tool. You cannot create a client profile, import their CAS, and then analyse their specific holdings — the overlap between their funds, their LTCG position by client, their goal-specific SIP requirements. Every analysis starts from a fund, not from a client. For an RIA managing 25 families, that means manually translating fund research into client-specific context for every review.

No CAS import. Understanding a client's actual portfolio — what they own, what it cost them, when they bought it — requires importing the CAMS or KFintech CAS PDF. ValueResearch Pro doesn't do this. You are manually re-entering or maintaining a parallel spreadsheet.

No tax position by client. The LTCG harvest analysis above is not something ValueResearch Pro can do for you. Nor can it show ELSS lock-in status, debt fund tax classification by holding period, or FY-specific realised/unrealised splits per client.

No AI synthesis. You read the data; you do the synthesis. For an experienced analyst, this is fine. For an RIA handling 20 clients across 60+ schemes, synthesising the fund quality, performance consistency, composition, and macro context for each fund in a client review takes hours.

The practical implication

Most RIAs use ValueResearch Pro for fund research and then manage client portfolios in Excel. The two are never connected. The research doesn't flow into the client view; the client's actual holdings don't inform the research. Every client review involves manually reconciling two separate data sources.

This is not a criticism of ValueResearch — it built a fund-research database, not a client-portfolio management system. But the gap is real, and it costs RIAs 2–4 hours per client per quarterly review.

Informational only — not investment advice. Flirting with Finance is not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst. ValueResearch is an independent entity; this article reflects the author's analysis of publicly available product features.